A Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Systems in the United States and Sweden: Lessons and Implications for Pakistan

Authors

  • Zul Ul Ane Fatima PhD Scholar, Department of Teacher Education, International Islamic University, Islamabad Author
  • Tabassum Shairwani PhD Scholar, Department of Teacher Education, International Islamic University Islamabad Author
  • Syeda Aqsa Bint a Zafar PhD Scholar, Department of Teacher Education, International Islamic University Islamabad Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59075/fzf8gq61

Keywords:

Higher education systems, institutional structures, funding models, accessibility, pedagogy, United States, Sweden, Pakistan

Abstract

This paper presents a critical comparative analysis of the higher education systems of the United States and Sweden, with a focus on institutional structures, funding models, accessibility, and pedagogical approaches. Anchored in a qualitative research design and systematic literature review, the study examines how both countries address contemporary challenges and opportunities in higher education. The analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of each system, offering valuable lessons for reforming Pakistan’s higher education sector. While the United States emphasizes institutional autonomy, research, and innovation, it faces persistent issues related to affordability and equitable access. Conversely, Sweden's centralized and publicly funded model promotes inclusivity and social equity but raises concerns regarding long-term financial sustainability and institutional flexibility. Drawing on the comparative insights from these two models, the paper outlines practical recommendations for Pakistan to develop a more inclusive, innovative, and globally competitive higher education system that supports national development and socio-economic progress.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-19

How to Cite

A Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Systems in the United States and Sweden: Lessons and Implications for Pakistan. (2025). The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(1), 3356-3365. https://doi.org/10.59075/fzf8gq61