Impact of Microfinance on Agriculture and Livestock Production: Insights from Southern Punjab, Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59075/r9he0v07Keywords:
Microfinance, Agricultural, Production, Live Stock Holding, Self-Sufficiency, Southern PunjabAbstract
This research examined how microfinance affected livestock and agriculture in Pakistan's Rajanpur and Muzaffargarh areas. Data from 120 participants was collected with 60 participants from each district. This research observed that a much larger percentage of the microfinance participants was associated with producing their food. Microcredit can reduce vulnerability by enhancing the diversification of sources of income for households, increasing savings, enhancing credit availability, and consequently improving household savings management skills and farm productivity. To investigate the impact of forecasting factors on farmers' involvement in microfinance, probit regression analysis was employed. Despite the higher till and wheat output, revenue, gross margins, and livestock gross margins, microfinance farmers' expenditures associated with till and wheat were also significantly higher. Participation in microfinance was shown to lead to increases in rice and wheat production and margins. It shows that the more units of livestock, at 5% levels, farm participation in microfinance is falling whereas the number of microfinance institutions is falling. The findings show that microfinance loan recipients benefited from increased household spending, income, savings, and saving motivation. In a similar vein, microfinance initiatives contribute to the expansion of economic activity and job prospects in the local communities. The members' social standing is also raised, their health is improved, their level of education is raised, and women's participation in domestic duties is strengthened. The study's conclusions will help Pakistan improve its policies on microfinance. The findings are concurred with by, who, in their study, revealed that when women's education levels are low, then the possibilities of entry into microfinance are high. The favorable effect of participation in microfinance for farmers was that, with a 1% level of significance, taking credit for agriculture was significant. There was a 47% rise in the likelihood of microfinance participation for every household that took out loans. This study establishes the new significance of research as a practical form in the area of local microfinance operations' effectiveness in reforming the agriculture sector.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.