How Cognitive Dissonance Affects Student Engagement and Learning in AI Powered Education Systems

Authors

  • Muhammad Umar Habib LUMS Author
  • Wasim Akram University of Texas at Dallas Author
  • Dr. Sadaf Saleem NUST School of Health Sciences (NSHS), National university of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad Author
  • Andleeb Shakoor Riphah international university Lahore Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59075/r1zta509

Keywords:

Cognitive Dissonance, AI-Based Learning, Student Participation, Adaptive Learning, AI-Based Performance Feedback, Regression Analysis, ANOVA, Metacognitive Strategies, Adaptive Learning.

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of cognitive dissonance on student engagement and learning adaptation in AI-powered education. Based on a quantitative research design, data from 270 university teachers in Punjab were retrieved using a self-administered questionnaire. Findings show a moderate negative correlation between cognitive dissonance and student engagement with r = -0.542, p = 0.001, indicating that increased dissonance results in lower motivation and participation levels. A significant effect of the regression analysis for AI-generated feedback is that motivation and learning adaptation increase (B = 0.612, β = 0.548, p = 0.000, R² = 0.476), thus demonstrating the necessity for structured AI feedback. ANOVA results support that strategies of cognitive dissonance reduction highly enhance engagement and learning outcomes significantly (F = 9.76, p = 0.000). The validation lies in the appropriateness of adaptive learning techniques and metacognitive training. These findings recommend that AI-driven education should contain personalized feedback mechanisms and structured interventions to reduce the effects of cognitive dissonance. Longitudinal effects and cross-cultural variations in AI-based learning are left for future studies.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-12

How to Cite

How Cognitive Dissonance Affects Student Engagement and Learning in AI Powered Education Systems. (2025). The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(1), 1905-1917. https://doi.org/10.59075/r1zta509

Similar Articles

1-10 of 328

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.